Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Raj Kumar (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Raj Kumar (ITAT Chandigarh) The Chandigarh Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A) deleting an addition of ₹1.95 crore made under section 69A for alleged unexplained cash deposits for AY 2017-18. The assessee, an authorised distributor of mobile recharge coupons for Bharti Airtel Ltd., had deposited large amounts of cash in his bank account, which were subsequently transferred to Airtel for purchase of recharge coupons. The Assessing Officer, without conducting any enquiry and in an ex parte assessment, treated the entire cash deposits as ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted Vague Purpose in Form 10? ITAT Gives Trust a Second Chance Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied for Late Form 67 – Bang ITAT Allows Substantive Relief View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930