Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tahoora Proteins Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tahoora Proteins Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Excess Stock Found in Survey Is Business Income—115BBE Not Applicable for AY 2015-16- Survey Disclosure Can’t Be Branded u/s 69: Set-off of Losses Allowed by ITAT The Ahmedabad “D” Bench of the ITAT, in Tahoora Proteins vs ITO (ITA No. 1613/Ahd/2025, AY 2015-16), held that excess stock of trading goods found during survey u/s 133A constitutes business income and not unexplained investment u/s 69, and therefore tax u/s 115BBE was wrongly invoked. During survey on 02.03.2015, excess stock of Tuver Dal and packing material valued at about ₹1.20 c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930