Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bir Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bir Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Interest on Enhanced Land Acquisition Compensation Taxable u/s 56(2)(viii): Delhi ITAT Rejects Section 10(37) Exemption Delhi ITAT dismissed the Assessee’s appeal and held that interest of ₹33,03,628 received u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on enhanced compensation is taxable as “Income from Other Sources”, and does not qualify for exemption u/s 10(37). The Tribunal noted that the Assessee had received interest on enhanced compensation for compulsory acquisition of agricultural land and claimed exemption by treating such interest as part of compen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930