The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has recently unveiled a sweeping set of reforms through decisions of its 447th Council Meeting—reforms that undeniably signal ambition, confidence, and a desire to reposition Indian CA firms on the global stage. From permitting advertising by firms, enabling global networking, converging with international ethical standards, expanding management consultancy services, to celebrating the milestone of 10 crore UDINs, the message is clear: the profession is being reimagined for scale, visibility, and global relevance.
However, nestled within this bouquet of progressive measures is a recommendation that deserves deeper reflection—that audit fees should be accepted only through digital modes or banking channels, in line with the Government of India’s digital economy policy.
At first glance, this recommendation appears entirely reasonable—even inevitable—in an era of transparency, traceability, and formalisation. Yet, when viewed from the ground realities of the profession, especially at the grassroots level, the issue becomes more nuanced.
The Digital Push: Vision vs. Practicality
There is no debate that digital payments enhance accountability, reduce ambiguity, and align the profession with modern compliance standards. As custodians of financial integrity, Chartered Accountants must lead by example. In that sense, ICAI’s recommendation reflects ethical consistency and policy alignment.
But a recommendation, when made by a regulator, often operates as a de facto mandate.
India’s CA profession is not monolithic. It ranges from large, globally networked firms to thousands of small and sole practitioners operating in semi-urban and rural India—serving agriculturists, small traders, charitable institutions, and first-generation entrepreneurs. In many such cases:
- Clients still operate predominantly in cash-driven ecosystems
- Banking penetration exists, but banking comfort does not
- Digital literacy is uneven
- Delayed payments and fragmented collections are common
For such practitioners, audit fees are not just a transaction—they are often the difference between sustainability and survival.
A Paradox in Reform
Interestingly, the same Council meeting that champions:
- advertising freedom,
- global networking,
- expanded consultancy services,
- AI and sustainability assurance,
also introduces a recommendation that may disproportionately burden the smallest practitioners, who are least equipped to absorb friction in fee realisation.
If the objective is to build Big Indian Firms, the question arises: Should reform not also safeguard the viability of small Indian firms—the very base from which future big firms emerge ? Transparency must not come at the cost of exclusion.
Audit Fees vs. Audit Realities
Audits—particularly of small entities, trusts, societies, and local businesses—already face:
- fee compression,
- delayed payments,
- heightened compliance risk,
- rising documentation expectations (UDIN, peer reviews, NOCLAR obligations).
When fee collection itself becomes procedurally rigid, the compliance burden shifts silently from the client to the professional.
The risk is subtle but real:
- Either professionals absorb the friction silently, or
- They disengage from low-fee, high-effort audits—weakening coverage and oversight at the grassroots level
Neither outcome serves the public interest.
Recommendation or Regulation? The Need for Clarity
If acceptance of audit fees only through banking channels is:
- A best-practice recommendation → it should remain flexible, principle-based, and context-sensitive
- A future regulatory mandate → it must be phased, supported, and accompanied by safeguards
Clarity matters, because ambiguity breeds fear—not compliance.
A Balanced Way Forward
ICAI’s leadership deserves recognition for steering the profession toward global alignment and future readiness. Yet, reform is most powerful when it is inclusive, consultative, and adaptive.
A more balanced approach could include:
- Treating digital-only audit fee acceptance as a preferred norm, not an absolute
- Allowing exceptions for small audits, rural clients, and legacy engagements
- Issuing guidance—not just recommendations—on practical implementation
- Protecting members from disciplinary exposure where commercial realities intervened.
Strength Lies in the Entire Pyramid
ICAI today stands at a historic inflection point—globally respected, technologically empowered, and institutionally strong. Its reforms reflect confidence. But the profession’s true strength lies not only at the top of the pyramid, but across its entire base.
Digitalisation is the future—but transition must be humane, practical, and profession-sensitive.
Only then will reforms truly strengthen Indian firms—not just in size and visibility, but in resilience, inclusivity, and trust
Author Bio
