This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 14A Not on Auto-Pilot: Rule 8D Disallowance Quashed for Want of AO’s Satisfaction
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Bhishma Realty Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Bhishma Realty Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D cannot be made mechanically merely because AO considers the assessee’s suo-moto disallowance to be “low”. Assessee had earned exempt income & had already made a suo-moto disallowance of ₹94,147/-. AO, without recording proper satisfaction as mandated u/s 14A(2), invoked Rule 8D & made an additional disallowance of ₹20.06 lakh.
Tribunal found that AO proceeded on incorrect facts, including treating taxable STCG as exempt income & double-counting direct expenses already disa...




