Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sundarraj Sujatha Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sundarraj Sujatha Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Assessee challenged reopening for AY 2015-16 solely on the legal ground that notice u/s 148 dated 08.04.2022 was issued by JAO even though CBDT had already notified the Faceless Reassessment Scheme on 29.03.2022 pursuant to Sec.151A mandating that notices u/s 148A(b), 148A(d) & 148 must be issued only through automated faceless allocation. Tribunal found that the impugned notice was issued physically by JAO, not by NFAC, & therefore contravened the statutory scheme & violated Rule of Law. Tribunal noted that jurisdictional Madras High Court (...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031