Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sundarraj Sujatha Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Sundarraj Sujatha Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

Assessee challenged reopening for AY 2015-16 solely on the legal ground that notice u/s 148 dated 08.04.2022 was issued by JAO even though CBDT had already notified the Faceless Reassessment Scheme on 29.03.2022 pursuant to Sec.151A mandating that notices u/s 148A(b), 148A(d) & 148 must be issued only through automated faceless allocation. Tribunal found that the impugned notice was issued physically by JAO, not by NFAC, & therefore contravened the statutory scheme &a

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Notice Invalid as Approval Under Section 151(ii) Was Defective Form 35 Defect Curable, Dismissal Without Hearing Set Aside Reopening Dropped as Supreme Court Concession on AY 2015-16 Is Binding Bogus Purchase Addition Deleted Where Documentary Evidence Supports Transactions Section 10AA Deduction Upheld Despite Late Filing of Return View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031