Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjeev Sharma Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjeev Sharma Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Third-Party Search Material Can’t Sustain 153A: ITAT Delhi Quashes Assessments for Want of 153C Satisfaction In this batch of five appeals, Sanjeev Sharma challenged assessments framed u/s 153A for AYs 2013-14 to 2017-18, wherein additions were made on the basis of a PowerPoint printout named “Kautilya Airbus Proposal” seized during search on Deepak Talwar Group. The core legal objection was that the seized documents belonged to a third party & could be used against the Assessee only after recording mandatory satisfaction u/s 153C by (i) the AO of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930