Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Texo The Builders Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Texo The Builders Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) VAT Bills Don’t Save Cash Payments – ITAT Upholds 40A(3) Despite Genuine Purchases- Cash Payments on Working Days Hit by 40A(3), Assessee is a real-estate developer. Survey u/s 133A led to detection of substantial cash payments toward materials, labour & other project expenses. AO held that several payments exceeded the monetary limit prescribed u/s 40A(3), made on working days, & not covered by Rule 6DD exceptions. AO completed reassessment u/s 147 with major disallowances. CIT(A) partly allowed relief, directing AO to verify payments cat...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930