The court set aside conviction after finding inconsistencies in witness statements and absence of corroborative evidence. It held that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt.
The court set aside the conviction after finding inconsistencies in key witness statements and lack of corroborative evidence. It held that the prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt.
The SC held that imposing an additional bank guarantee was excessive when a ₹1 crore bond with sureties was already furnished. It overturned the HC view, emphasizing that bail conditions must remain reasonable and not financially oppressive.
The Court dismissed the petition as the same bail condition had been previously upheld. The key takeaway is that issues already adjudicated cannot be reopened.
The case deals with rejection of a delayed tax appeal due to insufficient explanation. The Court upheld the defect but allowed another opportunity to justify the delay and pursue the appeal.
The Court upheld addition of unexplained income after finding no credible evidence of the donor’s financial capacity. It ruled that failure to establish source and genuineness of cash gifts justifies tax addition.
The ruling confirms that additions cannot be made merely on suspicion without supporting material. The Court found that the Assessing Officer did not bring any evidence to disprove the assessee’s transactions.
The High Court quashed assessment and penalty orders after finding notices were sent to an incorrect email address. It held that improper service denied the taxpayer a fair hearing, violating natural justice. The case underscores the necessity of valid notice for lawful proceedings.
The case addressed rejection of a GST refund application without following mandatory procedural requirements. The Court held the order unsustainable and directed fresh adjudication in accordance with Rule 92.
The case involved a refund claim filed years after the taxpayer became aware of excess payment. The Tribunal held that delay under Section 11B barred the claim, leading to dismissal.
