ITAT ruled that failure to file a return does not justify taxing income without allowing legitimate deductions. The case was sent back to the AO to consider exemptions and deductions available in records.
ITAT Delhi held that reassessment proceedings for AY 2015-16 could not survive where the Section 148 notice was issued after 1 April 2021. The Tribunal ruled that such notices were barred by limitation and the resulting reassessment was void.
The tribunal held that GST, sales tax, and service tax refunds cannot be taxed where the assessee follows the exclusive accounting method and does not debit such taxes to the P&L account.
The authority ruled that failure to mention CIN on documents was not a continuing offence. Penalty was limited to specific instances, significantly reducing liability.
The court held that an adjudication order passed without considering the taxpayer’s reply is unsustainable. It remitted the matter for fresh consideration with an opportunity to respond.
The Court held that a single show cause notice covering multiple assessment years is not legally sustainable. Authorities were permitted to issue separate notices for each year.
The ruling highlights that ignoring a taxpayer’s additional reply and request for hearing renders the order unsustainable. The case was remanded for reconsideration after proper opportunity of hearing.
The court held that the revised 18% GST rate is applicable, but deferred recovery of the 6% differential tax as reimbursement from government authorities was pending.
The tribunal held that failure to consider relevant documents denied proper adjudication. It set aside the orders and allowed fresh examination of compliance evidence.
The decision underscores that failure to follow the prescribed valuation procedure under section 50C leads to invalidation of additions. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee due to lack of proper DVO reference.
