The Bill increases eligibility limits for small companies, widening coverage and reducing compliance obligations. The reform aims to promote ease of doing business while simplifying regulatory requirements.
GST registration cannot be cancelled merely due to an unregistered rental agreement, as it is not a statutory ground. Courts emphasize that procedural defects do not justify drastic actions like cancellation.
The court held that failure to grant a personal hearing violated statutory provisions and natural justice, invalidating the proceedings. It ruled that such defects cannot be cured at the appellate stage.
The court held that parties cannot introduce additional evidence as a matter of right under Rule 29. The ITAT’s acceptance of Revenue-filed evidence and remand order was set aside as beyond jurisdiction.
The issue involved rejection of an appeal against GST cancellation on limitation grounds. The Court granted relief by following consistent precedents, allowing restoration subject to compliance conditions.
The issue involved denial of exemption on sale of agricultural land. The Tribunal held that the land met conditions of Section 2(14)(iii), making gains non-taxable. The case examined whether land sale constituted business income. The Tribunal ruled that absence of development or trading intent invalidated such classification.
Tribunal holds buyer’s intended industrial use does not alter land classification; gains from sale of agricultural land held non-taxable.
The court held that revision under section 263 requires independent satisfaction by the PCIT. Acting merely on the Assessing Officer’s view renders the revision order invalid.
The circular addresses the need for standardized regulatory knowledge among intermediaries. It mandates certification for key personnel to ensure compliance and improve operational standards.
The issue concerns identification of systemically important insurers. The regulator retained the same entities, emphasizing their critical role and need for enhanced supervision.
