The ROC held that undertaking new activities without prior amendment of the Memorandum breaches Section 4(1)(c). Even subsequent regularisation does not erase liability for the period of non-compliance.
The order addresses an auditor’s omission to flag registered charges despite contrary financial disclosures. It confirms that such reporting lapses invite penalties under company law.
The Registrar held that failure to display the exact registered office address on the company signboard violates Section 12 of the Companies Act. Even after rectification, penalties were upheld for the period during which the default continued.
The appellate tribunal quashed orders permitting bankruptcy against personal guarantors after a creditor consented to grant additional time to submit repayment plans under the insolvency framework.
The Tribunal upheld deletion of additions after finding that sales receipts were supported by banking records, invoices, and audited books, with no contrary evidence from the tax department.
The High Court set aside GST orders where the show cause notice was served only on the portal after cancellation of registration, holding that principles of natural justice were violated.
The appellate tribunal upheld cancellation of enforcement proceedings after finding violations in service of possession and sale notices, emphasizing strict compliance with statutory rules.
The appellate tribunal held that staying recovery proceedings through a SARFAESI application was without jurisdiction when an alternative appeal remedy under the RDDBFI Act was available.
The court ruled that depositing money does not convert a non-bailable GST offence into a bailable one, yet upheld bail considering custody, punishment limits, and surrounding circumstances.
The court held that an appeal refiled within the CBIC amnesty period could not be dismissed on limitation. The appellate order was set aside and the appeal restored for fresh consideration.
