The appellate tribunal upheld rejection of a resolution plan where balance sheets lacked details and assets were valued at NIL. The ruling affirms that plans must be supported by transparent and credible financial disclosures.
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal after finding that bank records, agreements, and admissions established benami elements. Procedural objections were held insufficient to override substantive findings.
The ROC Bangalore held that obtaining and retaining a second DIN in violation of Section 155 of the Companies Act attracts penalty under Section 159. Despite the error being inadvertent and later rectified, the prolonged default of 3075 days resulted in a reduced but substantial penalty.
The ROC Bangalore imposed penalty for holding two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155 of the Companies Act, 2013. Even though the second DIN was obtained inadvertently and later surrendered, the continuing default for 1227 days attracted adjudication and monetary penalty.
The Supreme Court held that reassessment notices cannot be issued if limitation had expired under the old regime. The ruling affirms that the first proviso to Section 149 prevents retrospective reopening of assessments.
The Supreme Court restored bail to one accused after noting prior custodial interrogation, while permitting limited custody of the other. The ruling balances procedural compliance with individual circumstances in GST-related offences.
The Supreme Court refused to condone a 237-day delay and dismissed the SLP, also holding that the case lacked merit. The ruling underscores strict scrutiny of delay condonation.
The High Court held that delayed filing of Form 10B is a procedural lapse and does not justify denial of charitable exemption. Trusts otherwise compliant with audit requirements remain eligible for Section 11 benefits.
Information linked to verification of resolution plans was held exempt due to fiduciary relationship, reinforcing limits on RTI disclosures.
The appellate authority held that RTI cannot be used to seek confirmations or opinions. Information already available in the public domain need not be recompiled by the regulator.
