The issue concerned failure to furnish complete allottee details as required under Rule 14(6). The authority held the lapse attracted penalty under Section 450, reinforcing strict compliance in securities allotment filings.
The issue was missing mandatory allottee details in PAS-3 filings. The key takeaway is that incomplete disclosures invite penalties under Section 450.
NCLAT Delhi held that withdrawal of first notice via second notice under Sec.13(2) of the SARFAESI Act doesn’t invalidate the effect of the recovery certificate which the DRT has passed. Accordingly, PIRP was laid in time and hence appeals are allowed.
Incomplete disclosure in the return of allotment was found non-compliant. The company was directed to rectify defaults and pay penalties within the prescribed time.
The order holds that non-filing of MGT-14 for approving financial statements violates Sections 117 and 179, attracting penalty under Section 450 with monetary fines on the company and directors.
The order addresses failure to disclose occupation details of allottees in statutory filings. The authority held this omission to be a violation of securities allotment rules, attracting penalty under the Companies Act.
The issue concerned late filing of Form MGT-14 for a special resolution. The authority held the delay violated Section 117(2) and imposed penalties on the company and its officers.
Allahabad High Court held that bank not permitted to unilaterally reduce interest rates on Fixed Deposit Receipt [FDR] after issuance of the FDRs. Accordingly, these petitions are allowed and bank is directed to compute interest on FDRs at originally contracted rates.
The regulations replace the 2000 framework and restrict resident participation in guarantees involving non-residents, subject to defined permissions and exemptions. They also introduce enhanced reporting and compliance requirements.
The notification expands the list of designated Food Safety Officers, strengthening enforcement and monitoring of fortified rice standards.
