The Tribunal ruled that cash seized and previously taxed in the brother’s assessment cannot be taxed again in the assessee’s hands, remanding the issue to the AO for verification.
The Bombay High Court ruled that the six-month limitation under Section 254(2) starts from the date of receipt of the ITAT order, not the date of its passing, ensuring petitioners can file timely rectification applications.
The Court held that the show-cause notice under Section 73 CGST did not lack jurisdiction. It directed the petitioner to file a reply and allowed the Adjudicating Authority to examine all objections independently.
The High Court allowed a religious society to submit delayed audit documents, citing the treasurer’s age and Covid-19 as valid reasons, directing authorities to reconsider exemption under Section 11.
The Tribunal held that legal control under a JDA constitutes transfer for capital gains purposes. The assessee must provide acquisition cost details for recomputation.
Court directed deposit of 25% disputed tax, personal hearing, and submission of reply to ensure due process before final GST order.
The ITAT restored the case for fresh adjudication, noting that the assessee filed a return showing a loss and was not given proper opportunity to be heard before dismissal of appeal.
ITAT Pune ruled that Section 5A overrides Rule 37BA, granting full TDS credit of ₹45.28 lakh to a Goa resident whose wife did not claim her share, rejecting CPC’s proportionate restriction
Rakesh Kumar Pandey Vs ACIT (ITAT Lucknow) 7% Is Reasonable, 11% Is Wishful: ITAT Reins in Profit Estimation in Contractor’s Case- When Books Are Estimated, Disallowances Die: ITAT’s Clean Sweep in Search Assessment- Search Confession Can’t Rewrite Past: ITAT Caps NP at 7% & Deletes Pre-Search Additions Issue 1: Estimation of Net Profit after Search […]
ITAT Kolkata dismissed Rs. 6.52 crore addition under section 68, holding that cash deposits were substantiated by audited books and AO failed to reject accounts or prove them unexplained.
