The Rajasthan High Court ruled that a Section 148 notice for AY 2015-16 was valid as it fell within the ten-year limit for escaped income in search cases exceeding Rs.50 lakh.
The ITAT held that reassessment beyond four years fails when the reasons do not show the assessee’s failure to disclose material facts.
The Tribunal noted non-payment of significant dues, including EDC payable to ADA and tax liabilities, and admitted the Section 10 application, commencing CIRP and appointing an IRP.
The Tribunal admitted the insolvency petition after finding that the loan amount and default were undisputed. The ruling emphasizes that proven debt and default require admission under Section 7.
The Allahabad High Court quashed a GST registration cancellation order, ruling that the impugned order lacked reasons and was passed without proper hearing, violating procedural fairness.
The Court denied bail citing the serious nature of an organized GST evasion scheme and the ongoing investigation. The ruling highlights concerns over evidence tampering and the need to protect revenue interests.
The Madras High Court held that tax claims not included in a Resolution Plan approved under the IBC cannot be pursued, confirming all pre-approval dues stand extinguished.
The Court held that GST recovery exceeding 10% made earlier must be treated as statutory pre-deposit. The appellate authority must hear the appeal on merits without insisting on further payment.
The Tribunal held that allegations of mis-declaration and under-valuation were unsupported by evidence. The redemption fine and penalty were set aside as the valuation acceptance was attributed to clearance delays.
The Court held that multiple refund applications filed within time were wrongly rejected as time-barred. It ruled that COVID-19 limitation exclusion and earlier timely filings must be considered, directing reconsideration with interest.
