The Supreme Court refused to interfere after noting that the petitioner had an effective statutory appeal against the confiscation order. The Court upheld the High Court’s view and allowed the petitioner 30 days to file an appeal.
The Calcutta High Court remanded the matter for adjudicating authority to compute service tax on consolidated rental income exceeding threshold limits. Co-owners are not treated as a single entity merely due to a joint account arrangement.
Court permits execution of a single surety bond per district for 1,343 cases, citing exceptional circumstances. This relieves a 70-year-old accused from onerous bail conditions while ensuring court appearance.
Court rules that statements recorded under Section 133A during survey proceedings have no evidentiary value, invalidating additions for excess stock and cash.
ITAT Rajkot partly allowed appeal, directing that 90% of cash deposited during demonetisation be accepted as explained, with only 10% taxable under normal income tax.
The High Court ordered release of gold bangles and iPhones seized at the airport, recognizing them as bonafide wedding gifts. The petitioner must pay a redemption fine, with warehousing charges waived.
Court ruled that any person paying tax to a registered entity can claim GST refund under Section 54, remanding petitioner’s rejected claim for fresh consideration.
High Court allowed provisional release of 233 multifunctional devices subject to enhanced duty payment, 10% bank guarantee, and maintenance of detailed sales records.
The court ruled that the petitioner cannot challenge a GST refund rejection via writ, as a statutory appeal exists. The order upheld the authority’s jurisdiction in processing refunds.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a writ petition seeking Form 26A certificates, citing delay and laches as the petitioner approached nearly ten years after the License Agreement expired.
