Madras High Court mandates at least one reminder notice via RPAD before passing ex-parte GST assessment orders, citing natural justice in Pioneer Products case.
Kolkata Tribunal rules automated disallowance of Section 80P deduction for co-operatives due to belated filing not applicable for AY 2018-19; amendment effective from AY 2021-22.
Madras High Court reads down TNGST Act’s Section 3-B(2)(d) proviso, ruling it inapplicable to contractors assigning work to registered sub-contractors, citing Supreme Court precedents.
The NCLAT has dismissed an appeal by suspended directors of Satra Properties, upholding an NCLT order to recover ₹2.65 crore in a fraudulent transaction.
ITAT Mumbai held that denial of exemption under section 11 of the Income Tax Act not justified as advances given doesn’t violate provisions of section 13(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, appeal allowed and exemption granted.
Madras High Court held that in case of genuine reason, extension of time to file the reply should be granted. Accordingly, since the order was passed without granting extension the same is held to have been passed in violation of principles of natural justice.
ITAT Delhi held that in case of bogus purchases only profit element embedded should be taxed and entire amount of purchases cannot be taxed. Accordingly, AO directed to apply profit rate of 5% on unverifiable purchases.
ITAT Delhi held that different floors of a property cannot be construed as independent residential unit and instead had to be construed only as a single residential unit for purpose of claiming deduction u/s. 54F. Accordingly, grounds raised by revenue dismissed.
ITAT Hyderabad held that it is not obligatory on the part of the CIT(A) to set aside all the best judgment assessment orders passed u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act to the file of the AO. CIT(A) is obligated to address the grievance of validity of jurisdiction assumed by AO for initiating reassessment proceeding.
PCIT (Central)-2 Vs K.R. Pulp And Papers Ltd (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act rightly quashed by CIT(A) and ITAT since there was full and true disclosure of all the material facts on the part of the assessee. Accordingly, appeal of revenue […]
