ITAT Rajkot held that addition on account of unexplained investment in purchase of immovable property u/s 69 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be deleted since assessee sufficiently proved that all the payments are made from wife’s NRI account.
Andhra Pradesh High Court rules that a personal hearing must be granted before an adverse GST order, even if not requested, ensuring fair assessment under CGST Act.
ITAT Chennai held that when the cash is sourced out of recorded sales, the provisions of section 69A of the Income Tax Act could not be invoked since sales have already been offered to tax and taxing same again u/s. 69A would amount to double taxation.
ITAT Delhi held that the assessee has duly explained the source of his share of the investment made in the property purchased. Accordingly, addition towards unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income Tax Act is directed to be deleted.
ITAT Chandigarh sets aside ex-parte order against Karam Chand Sweets, remanding the case to CIT(A) for fresh hearing on merits. Assessee given one last chance.
ITAT Patna held that addition towards unexplained income upheld since assessee failed to prove genuineness of transaction and creditworthiness. Accordingly, appeal dismissed and addition upheld.
Kerala High Court sets aside income tax orders against Kerala Minerals & Metals due to lack of opportunity for a hearing. Case remanded for fresh consideration.
ITAT Pune held that once primary reason to believe that income had escaped assessment fails then AO doesn’t possess jurisdiction to tax any other income in reassessment order. Hence, re-assessment is unsustainable and liable to be quashed.
Bangalore ITAT remands case for reassessment of post-demonetization cash deposits by a bar & restaurant owner, directing AO to verify business income claims.
ITAT Bangalore remands case where order was passed in name of deceased assessee. Case sent back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication with additional evidence.
