In todays digital economy, selecting the right payment gateway is crucial for businesses aiming to streamline their payment processes. A payment gateway is a technology that facilitates online transactions by securely transferring payment information between customers and merchants.
ITAT Delhi held that cost to cost reimbursement on account of secondment of employees cannot be treated as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) as defined under Article 12 of India USA-DTAA. Thus, appeal of the assessee allowed.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act cannot exceed exempt income. Thus, disallowance u/s. 14A restricted to the extent of exempt income.
NCLAT Delhi held that corporate debtor failed to demonstrate a pre-existing dispute at the time of filing an application u/s. 9 of IBC. Accordingly, concluded that application u/s. 9 of IBC duly admitted and CIRP rightly initiated.
ITAT Ranchi held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) on account of non-prosecution without deciding the matter on merits is unsustainable in law. Accordingly, matter remanded back for de novo adjudication.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition on account of interest income earned on fixed deposits from Banks and rental income earned by the Society are eligible to set off of maintenance expenses. Thus, addition deleted.
A client was scammed by a fraudster posing as VRL Logistics. Learn how to spot and avoid such scams to protect your business from financial loss.
Rajasthan High Court held that since reassessment order is distinct and different, the period of limitation for exercising powers u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act would be the date of original assessment order. Thus, entire proceedings barred by limitation.
ITAT Nagpur held that once the computation of income is approved by the assessee before CIT(A) the same cannot be argued against the Tribunal. Accordingly, computation of income directed by CIT(A) upheld.
Tribunal found that the CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal without issuing a physical notice of hearing to the assessee, which constituted a breach of procedural fairness. In light of these findings, the ITAT determined that the matter required reconsideration and directed that the case be remanded back to the CIT(A) for a fresh adjudication.
