CESTAT Delhi ruled demand based solely on ST-3 returns vs. trial balance differences unjustified without proof of taxable services. Detailed analysis & conclusion provided.
Chennai ITAT’s ruling on Ramasubramaniam Sridhar Paul Vs ITO clarifies Sec.54F: no mandate on specific money usage for new investments under Capital Gain Account Scheme.
Detailed analysis of ITAT Ahmedabad’s order regarding CIT(A)’s authority to delete disallowance without considering AO’s findings under Income Tax Act, 1961.
Ahmedabad ITAT’s order in Atul Limited vs DCIT case discusses TP adjustments, volume discount, geography adjustments, and more. Detailed analysis provided.
CESTAT Chennai quashes penalty imposed under Section 114(ii) of Customs Act, citing lack of intent to export semi-finished leather. Full text analysis included.
Once a export benefit under which shipping bill was filed has been availed, the conversion to any other scheme cannot be allowed as either draw back scheme benefit could be availed or advance license benefit could be availed and not both
In a detailed analysis of Axis Bank Limited Vs ACIT case, Ahmedabad ITAT explains the difference between a Letter of Credit and Corporate Guarantee, resolving disallowance disputes.
Delhi High Court issues notice in the case of M/s Payworld Digital Services Pvt. Ltd. where Show Cause Notice (SCN) was adjudicated upon after 11 years. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
In the case of Millie Dey Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruled that the benefit of indexation cannot be denied to calculate long-term capital gain. Read the detailed analysis and conclusion here.
This article explores the concept of moonlighting, its legality in India, potential risks for employers, and efficient management strategies in addressing this phenomenon.
