Allahabad High Court’s judgment condoning 1365 days delay in a tax appeal, analyzing reasons and legal justifications. Key insights on delay condonation in tax cases.
Read the full text of Bombay High Court’s judgment quashing the notice under Section 148 for AY 2016-17 in Vardhaman vs. ITO case. Analysis and implications discussed.
The appellant’s claim of facing technical glitches in generating Form 26A was acknowledged, leading to the tribunal directing a fresh adjudication.
The assessee company having its business of builders and property developers, following mercantile system of accounting, filed its return of income on 30.09.2013 disclosing income at Rs.2,86,000/- after claiming deduction of Rs.4,03,40,492/-u/s. 80IB(10) of the Act.
Milap Shah vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) – 1190 days delay appeal due to medical reasons. ITAT remands income escapement notice under section 148 of Income Tax Act for detailed adjudication.
Allahabad High Court’s detailed judgment in Ashoka P.U. Foam (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of U.P. highlights the significance of proving intent in tax evasion cases, emphasizing the need to distinguish technical errors from deliberate actions under UPGST.
Read the detailed analysis of Allahabad High Court’s judgment on penalty for non-filing of Part B of e-way bill. Learn why the court quashed the order and allowed the petition.
Read the full judgment of Alok Steel Industries vs. State of Jharkhand. Jharkhand High Court rules GST order invalid without proper show cause notice. Analysis and implications.
Read the detailed judgment/order of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in PBL Transport Corporation vs Assistant Commissioner case. The Final Audit Report is quashed due to a violation of natural justice, as the petitioner’s reply was not considered. Get insights into the legal proceedings and implications.
Bombay High Court ruling: No penalty for ITR upload mistake. Detailed analysis of the case between Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-13 and Pinstorm Technologies Pvt Ltd.
