Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!
Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!
Explore the adjudication order against Mukka Proteins Limited for violating Companies Act, 2013, Section 135(1). Understand penalties imposed on the company and key personnel.
CESTAT Allahabad held that in case of foreign export proceeds, the Indian Exporters are not the recipient of services from the Foreign Bank/ intermediary bank. Accordingly, demand of service tax as service recipient on bank charges thereon unjustified.
Read about the penalty imposed by MCA on Dehra Dun Club for violating Section 14 of the Companies Act, 2013. Explore the details of the adjudication order and the consequences.
Explore the adjudication order against Mukka Proteins Limited for violating Companies Act, 2013, Section 178(1). Learn about penalties imposed on the company and its directors.
ITAT Kolkata held that revision of assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) unsustainable as levy of interest u/s. 115P of the Income Tax Act for short payment of Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) u/s. 115-O of the Income Tax Act, which comes under a separate Chapter, was not part of assessment order.
CESTAT Delhi held that area based exemption in terms of Notification No. 50/2003 dated 10.06.2003 available as manufacture of High Security Registration Plates is concluded in Himachal Pradesh only.
Kerala High Court held that denial of input tax credit merely on the ground of difference between Form GSTR -2A and Form GSTR-3B for tax period 2017-2018 unsustainable. The matter is remitted back to the Assessing Authority to reconsider claim of ITC irrespective of Form GSTR 2A
Delhi High Court held that while determining compensation for injuries suffered in the road accident only documentary evidence in form of Income Tax Return in support of the claim of income is sufficient.
Explore the CIT vs Chettinad Logistics case from Madras High Court. Analysis of Section 14A disallowance, Rule 8D, and its impact on income tax assessments.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that mere suppression of facts is not enough for invoking extended period of limitation. There must be a deliberate and wilful attempt on the part of the assessee to evade payment of duty.
