Kerala High Court held that the property tax can be levied on the building which becomes capable of use for residential purposes or other purposes. Hence, municipality is entitled to recover the property tax only from the date of issuance of occupancy certificate.
Delhi High Court held that as per Section 38(3)(a)(ii) of the DVAT Act a pre-deposit does not partake the character of tax or duty, and hence Tax Department can neither retain the same nor could it utilize the same for adjustment purposes towards tax liability for different assessment years.
Discover how Dabur India Limited secured a favorable CESTAT Kolkata ruling. Learn why honey is not considered an exempted good and how Rule 6 of CCR does not apply.
Discover the CESTAT Mumbai decision in the I Gate Global Solutions Ltd. case. Learn why rebate claims for exported services require a clear correlation with FIRC.
CESTAT Mumbai upholds the rejection of a service tax refund claim by RJB Estate Pvt. Ltd. Find out why the claim was denied and the legal reasoning behind it
Learn why CESTAT Chennai ruled that appeals before the tribunal abate once the NCLT approves a Resolution Plan. Explore the case of Dhanalakshmi Paper Mills Pvt. Ltd.
In a recent case, ITAT Delhi ruled that having a difference of opinion alone is insufficient to invoke Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi rules that penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act cannot be imposed based on non-existing or deleted disallowances.
In a recent case, ITAT Delhi ruled that an appeal by a suspended director after appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) is not maintainable.
In a recent case, ITAT Kolkata ruled that TDS on rent reimbursement is not deductible if there is no lessor and lessee relationship, siding with McNally Bharat Infrastructure.
