CESTAT Chennai held that amount already paid towards the duty liability and interest before issuance of show cause notice. Notice issued only for levying penalty is untenable. Hence, levy of penalty u/s. 78 deleted.
CESTAT Kolkata held that Cenvat Credit can be utilized for payment of service tax on ‘import of services’. Accordingly, duty demand denying the same is unsustainable.
ITAT Pune held that subsidy received by the assessee is towards the investment made in the expansion of its industrial unit under the Package Incentive Scheme 2001 is ‘Capital’ receipts. Accordingly, the same is not taxable.
Dive into legal complexities and key takeaways of case Crown Milk Specialities Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Customs concerning conversion of shipping bills from Drawback to DEPB Scheme.
Explore the crucial legal battle between Arasan Amuthan Construction and the Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax. Understand why no service tax is due on pre-2007 contracts according to CESTAT Chennai.
Analysis of the ITAT Mumbai ruling in FDC Limited Vs PCIT. Find out why ITAT quashed the revision order concerning Form 3CM, Form 3CL, and deductions under section 35(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
Analysis of ITAT Chennais decision in the case of DCIT Vs Kannan Rajendra Babu, directing a 25% profit estimation on income from sale of milk products during the 2016 demonetization period.
Analysis of ITAT Hyderabads decision on ACIT Vs Owens Cornings Industries, focusing on 60% depreciation eligibility for computers and peripherals under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
An in-depth analysis of the ITAT Chennai’s decision on ITO vs Eshakti Com Pvt Ltd, focusing on the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
Analysis of ITAT Kolkata ruling in Nabirul Islam Vs DCIT, stating that TDS is not applicable on discounts given to retailers on sale of prepaid SIM cards or mobile recharge cards.