Section 40A(3) is a provision of the Act dealing with the taxability of payments that can be considered as expenditure. Under this provision, any expenditure in the form of allowance or reimbursement, made by an employer to his employees, shall be treated as income in the hands of the employees when the amount of expenditure incurred is not less than the amount specified under sub-section (2) of section 40A, or when the actual expenditure incurred by the employer is not otherwise verifiable (by means of documents, vouchers, etc.).
The fact that shares were traded on stock exchange after paying securities transaction tax, and that money had been received through banking channels only demonstrated that they were not bogus transactions.
A.O. held that since the assessee is maintaining its books of accounts on accrual basis, the income in respect of bad and doubtful debt was required to be taxed on accrual basis except for the exceptions provided under rule 6EA of Income-Tax rules, 1962 read with Section 43D of the Act.
VRV Trading Co Private Limited. Vs Union of India & Ors (Calcutta High Court) 1. These intra-Court appeals have been filed by the writ petitioners against the order dated 22nd November, 2022 in W.P.A. No.23437 of 2022/ W.P.A. No.23438 of 2022 in and by which the learned Single Bench had declined to grant any interim […]
Hrishikesh Mega Township (P) Limited Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Kolkata) In this case satisfied that the assessee has nothing to say in support of its alleged bogus share capital claim. Apart from the above, we also notice that impugned order was passed in 2016 by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority, whereas appeal has been […]
It is pertinent to note that to meet the emergency situation of additional expenses by the assessee the assessee has obtained cash not only from assessee’s father and mother but also the close relative i.e. the maternal uncle, maternal aunt as well as paternal uncle and paternal aunt and the said relation cannot be doubted by the Assessing Officer.
During the appellate proceedings, the assessee has submitted that it has taken loan for purchase of two residential properties which have been allotted to two Directors for their residential purposes. It was submitted that the perquisite value on account of residence has been accounted for in the income of the Directors and has been offered for taxation.
ITAT held that high turnover is a ground to exclude a company from the list of comparable companies in determining ALP, held that there were contrary views on the issue and hence the view favourable to the Assessee laid down in the case of Pentair Water (supra) should be adopted.
The LO does not constitute a fixed place through which business of assessee is carried out in India. Employees of the LO do not negotiate, finalise or discuss the mechanics of contracts including pricing with the assessee’s customers. As such the employees of LO merely act as a communication link between the assessee and the airline companies. The LO did not carry any activity, beyond that permitted by the RBI. The activities carried by the LO are thus, preparatory (auxiliary) in nature. The activities/operations of the assessee in connection with the contracts are carried from outside India.
Section 114A of Customs Act, 1962 ibid deals with imposition of mandatory penalty in certain cases. As per the Customs Act it is the importer who is to file the bill of entry to the proper officer u/s. 46 ibid while importing the goods and the assessment has to be made on that bill of entry and on such assessment, the duty is levied
