Chhattisgarh High Court held that the amendment to section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017, that the interest shall be levied on that portion of tax paid by debiting the electronic cash ledger (i.e. net tax liability) is effective retrospectively from 1st July 2017
CESTAT Delhi held that provisions of rule 3(5A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules are not attracted when there is no removal of capital assets/ power plant. Hence Cenvat Credit not leviable.
ITAT Chennai held that as the value of goods are duly accepted by the Central Excise department without there being any modification then AO doesn’t have any jurisdiction to go beyond the same.
ITAT Patna partly allows appeal of Anil Kumar Singh. Orders restoration of the claim of remuneration, including bonus, based on Partnership Deed under Section 40(b)(v).
Shivaji S. Desai Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) The service of notice issued under Section 143(2) of the Act directly by affixture, and that too, on an address on which the assessee had never resided or carried its business is not a valid service. In fact, there is no service of notice issued under section 143(2) […]
Devinder Singh Narang Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Chandigarh) On behalf of Revenue it has been submitted that despite the extension of time granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Appellant failed to comply with the order of pre-deposit of Rs.50 lacs. We have seen the case records and find that time and again the […]
It is well settled law that the legislative intent, extending certain beneficial provision to the assessee, should not be made frivolous by interpreting the provision in a particular manner other than the one which reflects upon such intent.
Abaris Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Vs C.C. Ahmedabad (CESTAT Ahmedabad) In the case on hand, from the material on records, we could see that apparently, there was an error, on the part of the CHA who inadvertently mentioned Notification No. 12/2012- Customs and accordingly discharged 5% customs duty., whereas, the benefit of Notification No. 46/2011 was […]
Delhi High Court in Shri Sai Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd. (supra) has considered a similar position and has held that issuance of a show cause notice with a period lesser than seven days would vitiate the same.
Mars Shipping Services Vs Commissioner of Customs (Madras High Court) As regards the show cause notice, dated 8.9.2014, it is to be noted that the respondent has followed the procedure contemplated under the Regulations after having passed an order for continuing the suspension, by proceedings dated 28.8.2014. As per Regulation 18 of the CBLR, 2013, […]
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
