A common question that arises in the real estate sector is whether the RERA judgments are applicable to transactions concluded before the date of judgement.
Supreme Court in Union of India Vs. Filco Trade Centre [P] Ltd directs GST Network to Open Portal For Tran-1/Tran-2 Forms for 2 Months
On the anti-evasion front, the week gone by saw a case detected by Commissionerate of Central Goods & Services Tax, Alwar, involving evasion of GST on the basis of misclassification of specified parts of engines as articles of iron and steel.
In relation to the benefit of exemption of duties accorded to Chemiluminescence Immuno Assay (CLIA) kits, the Board is in receipt of representations seeking a clarification on whether Electro chemiluminescence Immuno Assay (ECLIA) kits are covered under the ambit of CLIA diagnostic kits.
Home Developers Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) On perusal of the agreement, it was observed that the assessee paid Rs.36,09,000/- being compensation paid to land-owners, for allotting less than agreed constructed area, as per development agreement. The AO asked the assessee to submit the supporting documentary evidences viz., confirmation from the parties, books of accounts of their parties […]
P C Financial Services Private Limited Vs Deputy Director of Income Tax (Delhi High Court) 1. Present application has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking modification of the order dated 31st May, 2022 passed by this Court by relying on the order dated 31st May, 2022 passed by a learned Single Judge of […]
Urmila Vs Income Tax Officer (Rajasthan High Court) the very substantial point which has been raised by the petitioners that one single cash deposit of Rs.34,01,000/- has been taken as two different transactions, which according to the petitioners is factually incorrect and not borne out from any of the record including transactions made as entered […]
Applicability of Standards/Guidance Notes/Legislative Amendments etc. for November, 2022 for CA Foundation Course Examination, Intermediate Level (New Course) and CA Final Examination.
Scania Commercial Vehicles India P Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Customs (Import) (CESTAT Mumbai) In this case appellant had mis-classified the goods with an intention to evade payment of appropriate Custom duty. The appellant resorted to mis-classification / mis-declaration of description of goods showing number of packages as two instead of manifested number of packages as […]
Since, the claims are appeared for audited balance sheet of the Corporate Debtor, it is a duty of the RP to consider it for inclusion in information memorandum.