Follow Us :

Archive: 01 October 2018

Posts in 01 October 2018

Reporting of financial statements by a Company in XBRL

October 1, 2018 7206 Views 6 comments Print

XBRL stands for Extensible Business Reporting Language. It is a language for the electronic communication of business and financial data which is revolutionizing business reporting around the world. It provides major benefits in the preparation, analysis and communication of business information.

Procedure for “Manual correction in EDI Bills of Entry JNCH -Reg.

October 1, 2018 4926 Views 1 comment Print

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NHAVA SHEVA-III MUMBAI CUSTOMS ZONE-II JAWAHARLAL NEHRU CUSTOM HOUSE, NHAVA SHEVA, TAL: – URAN, DIST: RAIGAD. PIN – 400 707. No. S/12-Gen/Misc-216/DPD-RMS/16-17/JNCH Dated 01.10.2018 PUBLIC NOTICE NO. 134/2018 Subject: – Procedure to be followed for “Manual correction in EDI Bills of Entry JNCH -Reg. Attention of the Importers, Exporters, […]

Mere use of any forged or counterfeit currency/bank notes is not an offence

October 1, 2018 7524 Views 0 comment Print

Sanskriti Jayantilal Salia Vs. State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) When mens rea is conspicuously absent, mere use of any forged or counterfeit currency notes or bank notes cannot attract the provisions of Section 489(B). The essential ingredient of the said offence being that the person, who receives the notes has reason to believe that […]

Reassessment invalid if notice U/s.143(2) was not issued

October 1, 2018 3315 Views 0 comment Print

Where AO had framed the reassessment under section 148 without issuing notice under section 143(2), the reassessment order was invalid because it is mandatory obligation of AO to serve notice by assigning reasons therein with regard to his belief of escaped tax liability before making assessment of any escaped income.

TPO cannot conclude presence of international transaction u/s 92B merely surmises

October 1, 2018 735 Views 0 comment Print

Moet Hennessy India Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)  In the present case, no new facts have emerged and all the facts brought to record, during the course of the assessment proceedings, do not indicate legally sustainable basis for coming to the conclusion that there was an internal transaction in respect of AMP expenses incurred […]

Section 112A relief on off Market transactions of acquisition of equity share

October 1, 2018 7788 Views 0 comment Print

Central Government, with a view to specify the nature of acquisition in respect of which the provision of sub-clause (a) of clause (iii) of sub-section (1) of section 112A of the Income-tax Act shall not apply, hereby notifies the transactions of acquisition of equity share entered into—

S. 68: Private limited co cannot say that it has no clue about Shareholders

October 1, 2018 1005 Views 0 comment Print

Pee Aar Securities Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The assessee before us is a private limited company which is, by law, prohibited from offering its securities for subscription by general public. It cannot, therefore, be really open to the assessee to say that we have no clue about who the subscribers to the share capital […]

BCCI is A Public Authority Under RTI Act : CIC

October 1, 2018 3486 Views 0 comment Print

Smt. Geeta Rani Vs CPIO, M/o Youth Affairs & Sports (Central Information Commission) The BCCI should be listed as a NSF covered under the RTI Act. The RTI Act should be made applicable to BCCI along with its entire constituent member cricketing associations, provided they fulfil the criteria applicable to BCCI, as discussed in the […]

Section 147 / 148 JCIT includes Additional CIT- Sanction by Additional CIT valid

October 1, 2018 1200 Views 0 comment Print

Vikram Singh Vs CIT (Allahabad High Court) The only contention raised by the learned counsel for the appellant-assessee is that the notice was not issued with the prior sanction of the Joint Commissioner, but sanction was accorded by the Additional Commissioner and, therefore, notice under Section 148 of the Act issued by the A.O. was […]

Where issue is a debatable legal issue, penalty U/s. 271(1)(c ) not leviable: PVR case

October 1, 2018 2937 Views 0 comment Print

DCIT Vs PVR Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah Many cases are emerging out in which it is being held that where a claim by assessee is in respect of a debatable issue, penalty under section 271(1)(c ) of the Income tax Act, 1961(for short ‘the Act’) cannot be imposed. Recently, in DCIT vs. PVR […]

Search Post by Date
October 2018
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031