Join our free webinar on July 4th at 4:00 PM to gain insights into the dematerialization of securities and recent amendments. Register now for key updates.
Join our free webinar on July 7 at 5 PM for insights into 10 recent High Court income tax judgments favoring assessees. Expert analysis by CA Dipak Dama.
In the said notification, in the ANNEXURE, in condition number 100, in clause (b), for the words “within a period of six months” the words “within a period of twelve months” shall be substituted.
Arjuna: Krishna, Which may be biggest cracker if we correlated with the Income Tax Provision? Krishna: Arjuna, listen gladly, the salesmen in the market sells different types of crackers likewise there are various provisions in various laws. Accordingly in Income tax the biggest cracker is the cracker that explodes in 6 different ways, we call it as ‘Six Shots’ and that cracker is of ‘SEARCH OR RAID’
Form ADT-1 for intimating appointment of Auditors, under section 139(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, by the companies is available for e-filing on the MCA website www.mca.gov.inunder company forms download with effect from 20thOctober 2014. Pursuant to this, Stakeholders are requested to file formADT-1 as a separate e-form, and not as an attachment to the […]
Clause 36 of Equity Listing Agreement inter-alia mandates every Listed Company to intimate stock exchanges on any material event which will have bearing on operation of company or any information which is price sensitive in nature. Clause 36 provides indicative events which may have ‘material impact’ on the performance or operations of the company.
Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax in his notice u/s 263 dated 18.3.2014 stated that prima facie deduction claimed u/s 80IC of the Act by the assessee is not justifiable on the following grounds :- 1. Assessee is assembling and trading LCDs and it is not carrying on manufacturing of goods.
Attention is invited to Notification No. 21/2014 – CE (NT) dated 11.07.2014 vide which the definition of “place of removal” has been inserted in the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 (CCR). Under these rules there are provisions that the credit of input services is available upto the place of removal. As the definition is now provided in the CCR, wherever Cenvat credit is available upto the place of removal, this definition of place of removal would apply, irrespective of the nature of assessment of duty.
As a measure of ease of doing business, henceforth two extensions of two years each in the initial validity of three years of the industrial License shall be allowed up to seven years. This is in supersession of Press Note No. 5(2014 Series) dated 02.07.2014,
Punjab & Haryana High Court in an older case namely Arjan Radio House vs Assessing Authority had held that a person’s registration certificate shall be deemed to have been cancelled w.e.f date of publication of the factum of cancellation in the official Gazette as a busy seller cannot be supposed to know whether the registration certificate […]
The CESTAT, Bangalore has recently held in the case of KPR Fertilizer Ltd Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Service Tax and Customs, Visakhapatnam II 2014-TIOL-2001-CESTAT-BANG that Micronutrient Mixtures are not Plant Growth Regulators if it contains Nitrogen or Phosphorous or Potash and would be classifiable as Other Fertiliser falling under Chapter Sub-Heading No.31059090and not 38089340 as claimed by the Department and therefore the Appellant has a prima facie case on merits.
