Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!
Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!
Therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) read with rules 18 and 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules.
in the matter of import of nonylphenol (hereinafter referred to as the subject goods), falling under the Tariff item 2907 13 00 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) (hereinafter referred to as the said Customs Tariff Act), originating in, or exported from, Chinese Taipei (hereinafter referred to as the subject country), the designated authority in its final findings vide notification No.14/13/2005 -DGAD, dated the 25th June, 2007
1. These appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” hereinafter referred to as), are filed against the common order dated December 31, 2001, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in three batches of appeals relating to orders under Sections 201(1), 201(1A) and 271C relating to the assessment years 1992-93 to 1996-97.
The court ruled that a duty may be enjoined on the taxpayer to make correct disclosure of income but if such a disclosure is based on opinion of an expert, (a registered valuer in this case) only because his opinion is not accepted or another expert gives a contrary opinion, same by itself may not be sufficient for arriving at conclusion that the taxpayer has furnished inaccurate information warranting penalty.
If you require any more information or have any questions about our privacy policy, please feel free to contact us by email at info@taxguru.in. At www.taxguru.in, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us. This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by www.taxguru.in and how it is used.
Notification No. 233 – Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following further amendment to the Notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, (Department of Revenue), Central Board of Direct Taxes, number S.O. 888(E) dated the 17th September, 2001, namely
Notification No. 232 – Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by section 118 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following further amendment to the Notification of the Government of India, Ministry of Finance and Company Affairs (Department of Revenue), number SO. 279(E) dated the 12th March, 2003, namely
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 and sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Commissioner of Customs, Inland Container Depot, Tughlakabad.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 and sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Commissioner of Customs (Exports), Jawaharlal Nehru Custom House, Nhava Sheva, Post Uran, District Raigad to act as a common adjudicating authority to exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on the Commissioner of Customs.
