In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Commissioner of Customs, Air Cargo Complex, Sahar, Mumbai to act as Commissioner of Customs, New Custom House, Ballard Estate, Mumbai, Commissioner of Customs, Kolkata and Commissioner of Customs, Air Cargo Complex, Chennai for the purpose of adjudicating the Show Cause Notice pertaining to M/s. Sanghvi Reconditioners Pvt. Ltd., 4th Floor, Mahavir Darshan, M.N.Koli Marg, Masjid, Mumbai – 400 003 issued vide F.No.DRI/BZU/E/4/99, dated the 28th February, 2002 by the Additional Director General (Hqrs.), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, New Delhi.
am directed to forward herewith a copy of the following Notification published in the Gazette of India (Extraordinary) for your information and necessary action
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Commissioner of Customs, Inland Container Depot, Tughlakabad, New Delhi to be the Commissioner of Customs(Port), Kolkata, Commissioner of Customs, Kandla, or, as the case may be, Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai for the purpose of adjudicating the show cause notice No.50D/25/98-CI, dated 11th February, 2002 issued by the Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, New Delhi to the below mentioned parties, namely.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Commissioner of Customs, Pune to be the Commissioner of Customs, Goa for the purpose of adjudicating the Show Cause cum Demand Notices pertaining to M/s. Ayesha Exports, D/5-5, Model Town -III, New Delhi – 110 009 and M/s. Kazal Impex, Delhi – 110 009, issued vide F.No.DRI/BZU/C/34/2001, dated the 12th November, 2001 by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Mumbai Zonal Unit.
Circular No. 649/40/2002-CX I am directed to state that representations have been received from the trade and industry seeking clarification on the computation of the exemption limit available to a textile processor undertaking stentering of cotton fabrics with the aid of an open-air stenter and the definition of an open-air stenter. The matter has been examined carefully and the clarification is as given below.
Circular No. 648/39/2002-CX I am directed to refer to Part III of Chapter 7 of Central Excise Manual issued in September 2001relating to Simplified Export Procedure for exempted units and to say that representations from small scale manufacturers have been received by Board with a request to accept Sales Tax documents as proof of export for the supplies made to other domestic manufacturers who use the said goods in manufacture/packing of goods for export
