Supreme Court has reversed the decision of Guj HC Decision & allowed the Revenue Appeal GST/Customs – Section 3(7) and Section (9) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 – Exemption of IGST and GST Compensation Cess on import of inputs against Advance Authorization – Revenue appeal against Gujarat High Court judgment wherein mandatory fulfilment of a ‘pre-import condition’ incorporated in the Foreign Trade Policy of 2015-2020 and Handbook of Procedures 2015-2020 by Notification No. 33/2015-20 and Notification No. 79/2017-Customs, dated 13.10.2017 was held to be arbitrary and unreasonable
During the pendency of this writ petition, the competent authority under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 had issued a notification dated 31.03.2023 and as per the said notification, on the conditions being fulfilled, the cancellation of registration effected on the ground of non-filing of GST return, could be revoked.
Assessee is eligible to avail ITC on purchase of a 7-seater vehicle, which will be subsequently converted into an ambulance for onward supply
Any actions that could endanger the natural ecosystem and the life, health, and safety of all living things are prohibited by environmental law.
ACIT Vs Jila Sahakari Kendriya Bank (ITAT Indore) Provision for Standard Assets Allowable under Section 36(1)(viia) of Income Tax Act, 1961
Delhi High court held that in case there is supply or deemed supply of goods and rendering service, the same will fall within the ambit of works contract service regardless of whether or not VAT or service tax is payable.
Calcutta High Court held that warehousing agency namely CWC (Central Warehousing Corporation) is statutorily entitled to demand and collect rent for the storage on the date when goods were entrusted to the custody of CWC.
ITAT Delhi held that as per partnership deep, partners shall be entitled to interest on their loan accounts with the firm at the prescribed rates, hence disallowance of the same is unjustified.
ITAT Mumbai held that based on suo motu disallowance, additional disallowance on travel expenses and foreign travel expenses unjustified.
Madras High Court granted the stay in respect of 80% of the demand, as 20% of the disputed tax, interest and penalty already recovered by the department from the bank account of the petitioner.
