Active Ads Vs State of West Bengal & Ors. (Calcutta High Court) HC find that this matter does not warrant to be heard on affidavits. The appeal was dismissed only on the ground of failure of the petitioner to make the pre-deposit. Taking a lenient view as to the default as the same will non-suit […]
HC find no substance in AO’s reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment in as much as there is no mention of any tangible material that led to his conclusion. The entire process is triggered on a change of opinion as to the calculation of tax payable by the assessee.
Baldev Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) On perusal of the assessment order, it appears that the assessee has deposited cash amount to Rs.19,49,553/- in the savings bank account in Financial Year 2011-12 relevant to Assessment Year 2012-13 in question. The Assessing Officer attempted to make inquiry on the source of such cash deposits but however […]
Thermoking Vs Commissioner of State Goods And Service Tax (Delhi High Court) In this case concessional rate of duty had been denied to the petitioner on the ground that the C-Forms, relied upon by the petitioner, had been cancelled by the concerned tax authorities in Haryana with retrospective effect. Mr. Rajesh Mahna submits that the […]
Interstate purchase of capital goods by assessee shall not affect benefit under Section 15(1) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003: HC
On examining the functions of ‘Google Chromecast’ and ‘Chromecast with Google TV’ as stated in the aforesaid paras vis-a vis the material information available in the public domain
Presumption that Petitioner beneficiary of accommodation entries based on statement of third party was disproved. Consequently, onus would be on AO to provide reasons to disbelieve bank statements and supporting documents for reopening the assessment.
whether the contention of Petitioner that Petitioner was unaware of these dates and therefore could not attend the appeal should be accepted.
ITAT Delhi held that proviso to Section 147 of the Income Tax Act gets applicable as reopening of assessment is initiated after four years of original assessment. Accordingly, re-opening of assessment based on mere change of opinion is unsustainable.
Supreme Court held that Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil being manufactured and marked as Homeopathy medicine is classifiable under Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act and cannot be branded as a cosmetic.
