ITAT Bangalore held that assessee, being a employees housing co-operative society, is eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) in respect of interest earned from co-operative banks.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that interest paid on money borrowed for the purpose of business is allowable as business expenditure.
ITAT Jaipur reinforces section 54F’s applicability, highlighting the distinction between actual sale consideration and stamp duty value for capital gains exemption, affirming the principle of real consideration over deemed value for investment in new assets.
ITAT Jodhpur upholds CIT(A)’s decision, negating the AO’s addition of Rs. 1.62 crore under Section 69C for Shri Prahalad Rai Rathi. The judgment clarifies all transactions were through banking, dismissing the alleged unexplained expenditure and unsecured loans as baseless.
Precondition of applicability of S. 14Ahas not been fulfilled in the present case in as much the law never contemplates to apply S. 14A in relation to a taxable income as in the present case
NCLAT held that NCLT erred in not allowing to vote in other modes other than in person in meeting of secured and unsecured creditors of Transferee company as permitted as per Companies Act, 2013 and rules made thereunder.
Delhi High Court held that rejection of bid of the petitioner by SAIL for not meeting the qualification criteria is not arbitrary and hence interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India unwarranted.
Delhi High Court held that it is outside the jurisdiction of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to compel a statutory body (ICAI) to outsource organization of CPE seminars, workshop or conferences.
Gauhati High Court held that betel nuts not being a notified item under section 123(2) of the Customs Act, 1962, the initial burden to show that the material seized is of foreign origin lies upon the revenue authority. Confiscation unsustained as revenue failed to discharge its initial burden.
NCLAT Delhi held that the NCLT has no jurisdiction to decide the validity or otherwise of the `Gift Deed’ more so when `fraud’ and `coercion’ is alleged.
