CESTAT Mumbai’s decision, clarifying role of Revenue in filing revise applications under Section 35EE of Excise Act, in the case of Mail Order Solutions (I) Ltd.
Court dismissed the writ petition arguing that the impugned assessment order under Section 147 of the Act was, in fact, an appealable order, and had been passed providing extensive reasons.
Bombay High Court, the court held that a writ petition is not maintainable if filed purely on apprehension or proposed action.
ITAT Delhi partially approves the appeal by the assessee in Sudha Vs ITO, eliminating additional cash deposit sourced from past savings and agricultural activities.
In Raunika Fashion Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) case, ITAT clarifies that Section 41(1) cannot be invoked when trading liabilities have not been written back in books of accounts.
ITAT Delhi’s ruling on Sentinel Consultants P. Ltd. vs ACIT addresses the due dates for PF-ESI contributions, aligning with the ESIC & PF Act over the Income Tax Act’s Mercantile System, impacting the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20.
An in-depth look at the ITAT Dehradun ruling in Saraswati Dynamics Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT, highlighting the importance of specifying the grounds for penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. Explore how the tribunal’s decision impacts tax jurisprudence
CESTAT Chennai held that service tax could not be levied on ‘delayed payment charges’ collected by the appellant from their customers from 01.07.2012 also.
Madras High Court directed provisional release of goods on the payment of enhanced customs duty. Further, directed that prayer for waiver of demurrage be addressed to appropriate respondent.
Discover the intricacies of the ITAT Pune’s recent decision in Vashi Parivaar Foundation Vs Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemptions), highlighting the importance of proving the genuineness of charitable activities for gaining tax exemption.
