ITAT Delhi allows INX News Pvt Ltd to claim a business loss, asserting the Assessing Officers failure to comprehend the nature of the companys business activity.
CESTAT Kolkata upholds that Coal Mines Provident Fund Organization (CMPFO) is not liable to pay service tax on administrative charges in the absence of service provider-recipient relationship and consideration.
Discover the recent ruling by the Delhi High Court quashing time-barred reassessment proceedings for escaped income below the mandatory monetary threshold.
A comprehensive review of the case National Building Construction Corporation Limited vs Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, exploring the impact of the correct classification under Section 65(105)(zzd) for construction contracts.
Analyzing the recent ITAT Delhi verdict in the Inter Globe Air Transport Vs ACIT case, highlighting the re-adjudication directive due to improper verification under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act.
Analysis of a significant case – Manohar Lal Sarraf and Sons Pvt Ltd Vs Pr. CIT, where ITAT Delhi overturned a revision order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act due to lack of jurisdiction. Dive into the details of the ruling
CESTAT Mumbai’s decision, clarifying role of Revenue in filing revise applications under Section 35EE of Excise Act, in the case of Mail Order Solutions (I) Ltd.
Court dismissed the writ petition arguing that the impugned assessment order under Section 147 of the Act was, in fact, an appealable order, and had been passed providing extensive reasons.
Bombay High Court, the court held that a writ petition is not maintainable if filed purely on apprehension or proposed action.
ITAT Delhi partially approves the appeal by the assessee in Sudha Vs ITO, eliminating additional cash deposit sourced from past savings and agricultural activities.
