ITAT Delhi, in a significant ruling, held that no addition can be made on unaccounted share capital if it has already been taxed under the category of ‘Source of Income’. Dive into the intricate details of the case: DCIT Vs Subhshree Investment Management Pvt Ltd.
ITAT Kolkata held that addition of advances received by the company as deemed dividend in terms of provisions of section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as advances are received from the concerns purely as business transaction.
CESTAT Chennai held that the provisions made in the books of account by the appellant as per the GAAP towards sharing the expenditure on account of receipt of sponsorship services cannot be subjected to tax.
ITAT Bangalore held that delay in filing the return and Form No.67, beyond period under section 139(1) of the Act, is not fatal to the claim of FTC. Foreign Tax Credit duly available in respect of income taxable in India and received outside India for the amount of taxes paid outside India.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that making of incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income. Therefore, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not sustainable.
ITAT Chandigarh held that loss incurred on account of embezzlement during the course of day to day carrying out of charitable activities by the trust is revenue loss and duly allowable.
CESTAT set aside the order demanding excise duty and held that the buyer who has paid a valuable consideration could not be proceeded upon by taking the aid of a larger period of limitation as per Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 unless it is proved that the buyer was also involved in fraud.
HC held that in case where assessee has disputes all the facts and allegation stated in the show cause notice the requirement of issuance of DRC-01A would be mere formality however, if issuance of DRC-01A would have serviced any benefit to the assessee, it would have been imperative for the court to enforce such notice on the Revenue Authorities.
ITAT Lucknow sets aside additions made for cash deposits during demonetization in Shiva Goods Carrier Pvt Ltd vs DCIT, orders de novo proceedings under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
CESTAT Chennai held that duty demand on semi-finished goods and finished goods not sustainable as goods are exported on payment of duty under section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
