Read about the Bombay High Court’s recent judgment in Kamlesh Kumar Mishra vs State of Maharashtra, allowing an advocate’s presence during interrogation under Section 70 of the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.
Dive into the Delhi High Court’s decision in the case of Ohmi Industries Asia vs Assistant Commissioner, which paves the way for GST refunds on Market Research Services.
In a landmark judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad overrules PCIT’s order, upholding that section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act cannot be invoked in case of short TDS deduction.
A detailed analysis of the ITAT Ahmedabad’s ruling in Bhutakia Bhimasar Vs PCIT, where it was held that a charitable organization should not lose tax exemption benefits due to technical lapses.
Understand the Bombay High Court’s ruling on PCIT vs Kimberly Clark Lever Private Limited case regarding the reference to TPO and the scrutiny assessment as per the Income Tax Act 1961.
The J&K High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a show cause notice on banned yarn shawl exports, asserting that the case’s jurisdiction lies in Delhi, not J&K.
Delhi High Court quashes a ₹10 crore tax demand, stating that an assessment order cannot be solely issued against one of the multiple legal heirs of a deceased taxpayer.
CESTAT Mumbai overturns service tax demand against Kellogg India, asserting that unpaid salary or notice pay recovery isn’t subject to service tax.
In a crucial verdict, the Bombay High Court allows BOCW cess refund to GE T and D India, emphasizing that supply contracts are outside the BOCW Cess Act’s purview.
The CESTAT Kolkata has dismissed allegations of suppression and quashed a service tax demand in the Bimal Auto Agency Vs Commissioner of CGST & CX case, providing significant implications for the treatment of incentive-based transactions.
