Detailed breakdown and analysis of the Competition Commission of India’s ruling on consumer fraud and counterfeit products in the Sanjay Kumar Vs Karagiri Studio case.
Explore the resolution process of Malar Energy & Infrastructure Private Limited. Learn about the challenges, COC meetings, and the approved resolution plan’s impact.
Explore the approval of M/s Land Nest Developers’ resolution plan in the NCLT Indore case (Navin Khandelwal vs. Mukesh Agrawal). Key details, analysis, and implications.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that amount of incentive received by the Advertising Agency from the print media cannot levied to service tax under Business Auxiliary Service (BAS).
ITAT Chennai held that addition towards amount received as income sustained as it was specified that the amount was not given as loan or advances but was given for service towards arranging the whole deal.
In present facts of the case, the Hon’ble Tribunal held that where a principal manufacturer did not file the requisite undertaking to the jurisdictional authority in terms of Notification No. 214/86, then the job worker was liable to pay the duty on the goods manufactured.
ITAT Delhi held that sale transaction cannot be said to be completed as and when the assessee has entered into the agreement to sale. Transfer of title is complete through registered sale deed.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that the Registration under a particular service is not necessary for the purpose of claiming exemption under Notification No. 41/2007 dated 06.10.2007.
Gujarat High Court held that order for cancellation of registration passed without assigning any reason is a non-speaking order and hence liable to be set aside.
CESTAT Delhi held that change of name from “safranal” to K-100 does not amount to be an act of mis-declaration as there is no evidence of evasion of customs duty.
