Intent of Notification No. 45/2017-Cus. is that goods sent from India earlier and subsequently re-imported as such should not suffer any Customs duty; in case the exporter had availed any incentive at the time of sending this equipment out of India, the same may need to be surrendered on re-import of the said equipment;
Understand the classification of various chikkies, such as Sesame, Chocolate Peanut, and Dry Fruit, under HSN codes and their applicable GST rates. Get insights into the head classification, treatment, and relevant details.
AAR ruled that hostel and PG accommodation cannot be considered equivalent to residential accommodation and thus such services are not eligible for exemption and accordingly are exigible to GST @12%.
The activity of charging the battery of an Electrical Vehicle is treated as ‘supply of service’ and falls under SAC 998714. It attracts GST at a rate of 18% in terms of entry No.25(ii) of the Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended.
Explore the exemption of education provided by Isha Yoga Center under GST. Analyze the applicability of Entry No. 57 and Entry No. 69 of Notification No.9/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017.
Learn about the classification and exemption of agricultural hand tools. AAR allows withdrawal of the application. Understand the implications and ruling on these tools.
Learn about applicable GST rate and exemption for services provided by Interviewbit Software Services under Market led Fee-based Services Scheme. Get insights from ruling of GST AAR Karnataka. Understand conditions for exemption and their interpretation.
CESTAT, Bangalore ruling clarifies LCD panel classification. LCD Panels classified under tariff entry 9013 8010, while parts under 9013 9010.
Explore BJ Services Company Middle East Ltd’s Customs Act ruling under section 28-H. Learn about re-import of goods, SEZ/FTWZ transactions, and exemption eligibility.
Detailed breakdown and analysis of the Competition Commission of India’s ruling on consumer fraud and counterfeit products in the Sanjay Kumar Vs Karagiri Studio case.
