A critical review of the case between Graphite India Limited and the Commissioner of Customs, with an emphasis on the significance of adhering to Project Import regulations and the implications of not doing so.
SC held that, value of items which were directly delivered to customer’s place and which never entered in factory of assessee should not be added to assessable value of goods supplied by assessee.
A last-minute application to stay LOCs for international travel met with strong disapproval and a fine from the Bombay High Court, reinforcing the importance of timely applications to court.
Read the analysis of the ITAT Kolkata order in the case of Asha Vijay Vs ITO regarding the inapplicability of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) to transfers that took place before the accounting year 2014-15. Learn how the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition made under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Read the analysis of the CESTAT Ahmedabad order regarding the absence of evidence of excise duty inclusion in the price charged from buyers. Learn how the CESTAT granted the benefit of cum-duty price and remanded the case for re-quantification of duty demand and penalties.
Explore the recent verdict by ITAT Delhi in the case of ACIT Vs Capricorn Identity Services P Ltd, where it supported the deletion of disallowance and acknowledged the revenue expenditure of business activities.
Learn about the recent order of the ITAT Chennai in the V. Babu vs ACIT case, where the CIT(A) appeal rejection due to delayed filing by the assessee is set for re-adjudication.
Explore the recent Telangana High Court decision in the case of Nektar Therapeutics India Pvt Ltd vs Union of India, where the court quashed a show cause notice due to its issuance by an improper officer.
Detailed review of the Satya Dharma Hotels Pvt Ltd vs ITO case, where the ITAT Delhi has directed a re-adjudication due to the AO not considering Section 55A of the Income Tax Act.
Insightful review of the ITAT Delhi ruling on the case Bharat Anand vs ACIT, highlighting the judgement on allowing business promotion and tour & travel expenses of a professional partner in a firm.
