CESTAT Delhi held that where the duty becomes refundable as a consequence of judgement decree order or direction of appellate authority Appellate Tribunal or any Court, the date of such judgement decree, order or direction shall be the relevant date.
NCLAT Delhi held that struck off of name from the list of Active Companies by ROC unsustainable as Company is having substantial movable as well as immovable assets, and hence it cannot be said that the Appellant Company is not carrying on any business or operations.
ITAT Mumbai held that activities of import of goods for re-export (i.e. trading activities) falls within the meaning of service defined u/s 2(z) of SEZ Act and accordingly the profits and gains derived from such services rendered from SEZ would be eligible for deduction u/s. 10AA of the Income Tax Act.
Analysis of the CESTAT Bangalore order in the case of DLF Southern Towns Pvt Ltd vs. Commissioner of Customs where violation of import policy led to confiscation and penalty.
Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessment, in the exercise of powers under section 147 read with section 148 of the Act, without tangible material to conclude that income had escaped assessment is untenable in law.
In-depth review of the Delhi High Court’s judgment in the case of CIT Vs L.G. Electronics Inc. Korea, highlighting key aspects and the implications of the ruling.
Comprehensive review and implications of the CESTAT Ahmedabads decision in the Modest Infrastructure Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise case.
Detailed review and implications of CESTAT Ahmedabads judgment in the case of West Coast Pharmaceutical Works Ltd Vs C.C.E.-Ahmedabad.
Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on the Goodluck Empire Vs CCE & ST case involving penalties under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.
Explore the landmark CESTAT Ahmedabad order on whether service tax is applicable to software activation charges under Business Auxiliary Service in the case of Avaya Global Connect Vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST
