Calcutta High Court asserts that the denial of the opportunity for cross-examination and failure to provide copies of evidence render an order invalid under the Income Tax Act.
Read the full text of the judgment by Punjab and Haryana High Court granting a refund of income tax on exempted disability pension income. Analysis of Circulars and Court Orders.
Explore CESTAT Chennai’s decision in Emerson Process Management Chennai case. Learn about duty on intermediate goods, Rule 6(6) of CCR 2004, and implications for manufacturers
The Jharkhand High Court heard a petition seeking the quashing of a First Information Report (FIR) and the entire criminal proceeding against Mr. Anupam Kumar Pathak, proprietor of M/S Maa Mahamaya Enterprises, in connection with a case of Goods and Services Tax (GST) evasion.
The Orissa High Court dealt with a writ petition challenging the 1st appellate order passed by the Joint Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Jajpur Range, Odisha. The petitioner, Biswal Sales, sought to appeal the order, but the 2nd appellate tribunal had not been constituted yet.
Delhi High Court orders a fresh investigation in the Rajnish Yadav Vs ITO case, pertaining to allegations of bogus purchases under the Income Tax Act, citing lack of furnished information to the petitioner.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that services of transportation of goods by a person other than GTA are clearly exempt under Section 66D (P)(i)(A) of the Finance Act, 1994.
ITAT Kolkata orders reassessment of Mohammed Meraj’s case due to the lack of substantiating evidence regarding a mismatch in Form 26AS and Profit & Loss Account in TDS deduction.
The case between the Commissioner of Customs (Air) and RBR Knit Process Pvt Ltd, regarding the eligibility for custom duty exemption of imported membrane systems, concluded with a favorable verdict for the latter by CESTAT Chennai.
Court ruled that the funds in the Term Deposit Accounts were the income of the Government of India and exempt from TDS under Section 196 of the Act. Moreover, the JKSRRDA, being wholly financed by the Central Government, was also eligible for exemption under Notification No. 3489 dated 22.10.1970, despite not being registered under the Central Societies Registration Act.
