Delhi HC sets aside reassessment order against Riya Gangwani for AY 2019-20, passed without considering the replies. Liberty given to AO for a fresh order.
Delhi HC quashed an Income Tax notice issued on the mistaken belief of property ownership in Mansi Garg & Ors Vs CIT directing correction.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled that services received outside SEZ are eligible for a refund of Service Tax under Notification No. 09/2009-ST dated 03.03.2009 as amended by Notification No. 15/2009-ST dated 25.05.2009, in Zydus Hospira Oncology case.
Kerala HC rules on Elite Green Pvt Ltd’s claim for 4% SAD refund. Court finds that publishing on DGFT’s website amounts to public notice. Details here.
Ruling on service tax liability for Grand Polycoats Co Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise. CESTAT Ahmedabad orders re-adjudication on the case
Tribunal held that once on a particular issue the show cause notice has been issued, on the same issue for the subsequent period no extended period can be invoked as demand for the extended period do not sustain being time bar.
CESTAT Chandigarh rules weighment by Food Corporation of India (FCI) doesnot fall under Business Auxiliary Service nullifying service tax demand.
Read about ATA Freight Line vs Commissioner case. Analysis of CESTAT Chandigarh ruling on logistics services, service tax liability, and appeal outcome.
ITAT Delhi held that receipts from disaster recovery playout services and disaster recovery up-linking services are not in the nature of Fee for Technical Service (FTS) as envisaged under Article 12(4)(a) of India-Singapore DTAA.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that under Section 29A(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act (A&C Act), there is no requirement that consent of the parties has to be expressed and that too, in writing for extending the arbitral period.
