Analysis of GST exemption granted to Polaris Foundation for public health awareness initiatives on COVID-19 in partnership with UNICEF. Key insights revealed.
In re Kalaiselvan SAGO Factory (GST AAR Tamil Nadu) Introduction: The case of “Kalaiselvan SAGO Factory” under the GST AAR Tamil Nadu delves into the availability of input tax credit (ITC) for GST paid at the time of purchase or repairs, particularly concerning JCB vehicles used for business purposes. 1. Background of the Case: M/s. Sri […]
Detailed analysis of the Advance Ruling in the case of J.K. Fenner (India) Limited regarding GST ITC claim on works contract for factory building repairs.
Proposed items of import namely, Optoma Creative Touch 5-series Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) (Model-5652RK+. 5752RK + & 5862RK+) merit classification under Sub-heading 84714190 of the First Schedule to Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Explore detailed analysis of CAAR Delhi order regarding classification of imported betel nut products by Shreehari Ananta Overseas Private Limited.
Importer seeks classification of Samsung Smart Monitors (Model No. LS27BM5) under Customs Tariff (CTH 8528 or CTH 8471) and duty exemption eligibility as per Notification No. 24/2005.
CCI issued an order against district and tehsil level chemists associations in Sriganganagar district, Rajasthan which were found to have contravened provisions of Section 3(3) read with Section 3(1) of Competition Act, 2002
ITAT Delhi held that initiation of proceedings u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act based on seized dumb documents found in the premises of third party is unsustainable in law as the seized documents are merely loose sheets not forming part of the books of account of the assessee and that they do not constitute admissible evidence.
Gujarat High Court held that mere rendering of services cannot be roped into Fees for Technical Service (FTS) unless the person utilizing the services is able to make use of the technical knowledge etc. Simple rendering of services is not sufficient to qualify as FTS.
Delhi High Court held that Sanitaryware meant for use in the kitchen, toilets or bathroom and although it may portray some art work in its designs, it is not artwork or handicraft Therefore, duty drawback could only be claimed in category of goods falling Chapter 74 vide item No. 741802.
