CESTAT Chennai held that Foreign Telecommunication Operator (FTO) is not the service receiver, but the visitors to India who use the service during their visit to India, are the service receiver and as per appellant’s own case the activity amounts to export of service and therefore, not exigible to Service Tax.
CESTAT Chennai held that cenvat credit availed on trading activity is not admissible, accordingly, cenvat credit admissible on common input services needs to be reversed by invoking the extended period of limitation.
Analyzing the GST advanced ruling application by Tamil Nadu Medical Council & reasons for its ineligibility due to prior pending proceedings.
GST implications on fees by TN Nurses and Midwives Council and grounds for rejecting their advance ruling application under Section 98(2) of GST Act.
Analysis of AAR Tamilnadu’s ruling on Harshitha Infra Engineering Pvt Ltd. highlighting jurisdictional limitations and the non-applicability of hypothetical scenarios.
18% GST rate determination by AAR for composite supply of works contract to Tirunelveli Smart City Limited, as highlighted in Naachimaar Engineering Constructions case.
Eligibility for Input Tax Credit (ITC) on motor vehicles used for transporting female employees during specific hours under the CGST Act, 2017.
An in-depth examination of GST rates applicable to services provided to Tamilnadu Water Supply & Drainage Board. Explore conclusions and implications from GST AAR Tamil Nadu ruling.
Analyzing GST & IGST on Luksha Consulting’s monitoring of UK software contracts. A detailed review of Advance Rulings and IGST Act implications.
In re Vignesh (Guru Traders) (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Introduction In a recent application to the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) in Tamil Nadu, M/s Guru Traders, led by Proprietor Vignesh, posed a significant question regarding the Goods and Services Tax (GST) implications of their bulk cement sales business model. Background M/s Guru Traders, based out […]
