ITAT Mumbai’s landmark decision: Mechanical approval under Section 153D of the IT Act vitiates assessments, making them liable to be quashed.
CESTAT Kolkata held that seized gold biscuits cannot be released as transportation of smuggled gold not justified based on fabricated transit challan and held mere general corroboration is sufficient.
ITAT Chennai held that transaction of purchase of own shares by the appellant company is distribution of accumulated profits within the meaning of section 2(22) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Accordingly, it is treated as dividend u/s. 2(22)(a)/2(22)(d) read with section 115-O of the Act.
Sikkim High Court held that as per guidelines of the Budgetary Support Scheme, if any unit undergoes for relocation, expansion and change of ownership, it will not be eligible under the Budgetary Support Scheme.
In a landmark decision, Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (KRERA) orders builders to allot common areas to homebuyers, addressing long-standing concerns of Karnataka Home Buyers’ Forum.
ITAT Delhi held that fringe benefit tax is an allowable deduction in computing book profit as per Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act.
Learn about case of Smt. Maninder Kartik vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi) regarding denial of exemption u/s 54 due to non-compliance and legal precedents that support taxpayer’s claim.
Delhi High Court held that ‘brand names’ falls within the scope of intangible assets and, accordingly, are amenable to deprecation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act.
Read about case of ITO vs. Gammon Construction Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi), where inappropriate demand for evidence of a non-occurring event is discussed and resolved. Learn more here.
Supreme Court held that the documents relating to acknowledgement claiming benefit of Section 18 of the Limitation Act can be accepted even at the appellate stage. Further, acknowledgment of debt in the balance sheet has been held to be a valid acknowledgment for the benefit of Section 18 of the Limitation Act.
