In present facts of the case, the revision petition was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which assails the order dated 05.05.2016 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh allowing the appeal and dismissing order dated 28.01.2013 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bhatinda.
Explore the case of Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma Vs. Union of India regarding GST registration cancellation, legal provisions, and the principle of natural justice.
This article discusses case of Gayatri Devi vs. PCIT (ITAT Jaipur) regarding Section 263, highlighting importance of genuine errors in assessments.
Calcutta High Court criticizes an adjudicating authority for not following senior officer’s orders, emphasizing the importance of judicial discipline in government offices.
Explore significant ITAT Jaipur ruling in case of Kunan Mal Kalu Ram Jain vs. ITO, highlighting rejection of profit estimation without rejecting books of accounts.
Explore Gujarat High Court case of Artiben Patel vs ITO regarding tax reassessment. Learn about legal arguments and conclusions in this detailed analysis.
Explore Bhailal Babubhai Patel Vs PCIT case in Gujarat High Court. Learn why a valid show-cause notice is crucial for recovery under Section 179.
ITAT Delhi held that when the assessee has shown cash withdrawals during pre demonetization period more than the cash deposited during demonetization then the source cannot be disputed. Accordingly, addition u/s. 68 deleted.
Bombay High Court held that the reopening of the assessment order based on change of opinion without surfacing of any tangible new information is unsustainable in law and liable to be set aside.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that construction service provided under Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JnNURM) are exempted from the clutches of service tax. Accordingly, demand of service tax set aside.
