CESTAT Ahmedabad held that refund under rule 16 of Pan Masala Packing Machine (Capacity Determination and Collection of Duty) Rules, 2008 allowable on account of change in constitution of firm into a private limited company.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that gratuity premium paid to LIC was to be treated as business expenditure and the same is allowable under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Supreme Court held that enhancing the price of imported goods by invoking rule 8 of the Customs Valuation Rules without any evidence is unjustified and bad-in-law.
CESTAT Delhi held that initiation of proceedings against Customs Broker alleging violation of regulation 10(n) of the Customs Broker Licence Regulations, 2018 unjustified as he is not the party to alleged mis-declaration and undervaluation.
Learn about the recent Supreme Court verdict that ruled Service Tax is not applicable to services provided to a Governmental Authority.
Jharkhand High Court held that TCS is not to be collected in the transaction of purchase of coal which is used in generation of power. Accordingly, illegal sum collected as TCS is ordered to be refunded back with interest.
Delhi High Court upheld the remand order passed by Sessions Court, in the money laundering case registered against Vivo, concluding that Section 19 of PMLA was duly complied with and thereafter the accused persons were remanded to the custody of Directorate of Enforcement.
The case centered on a circular that imposed limitations on the cumulative adjustment of ITC, contrary to the statutory provisions. The Court held that circulars cannot override statutory law.
Read about case of HIROTEC India Private Limited vs. Assessing Officer, where Madras High Court set aside an assessment order due to a violation of natural justice.
Read case of Renga Fabricators Private Limited vs. ACIT/ITO, where an outdated email notice led to quashing of an assessment order by Madras High Court.
